DIRECT

BOOG 2013-04

General Information

BOOG number

BOOG 2013-04

Nickname

DIRECT

Status

Date: 15/06/2023

Inclusion closed

15/01/2018

Full title

DIetary REstriction as an adjunct to neoadjuvant ChemoTherapy for HER2 negative breast cancer

Indication

Subindication

HER2-, any HR

Target sample size

250

Actual accrual

131
Date: 01/02/2018

Estimated study completion date

01/09/2017

Contact

Sponsor

BOOG Study Center

Principal Investigator(s)

J.R. Kroep, H. Pijl, J.J.M van der Hoeven

Study manager

R. Lugtenberg (studiecoördinator LUMC), A.E. van Leeuwen-Stok (BOOG SC)

Central datamanagement and randomization

Leiden University Medical Center Datacenter Surgery K6-R Phone +31 71 526 3500 Fax +31 71 526 6744 E-mail datacenter@lumc.nl

Monitoring

LUMC datacenter, Department of Surgery

Local datamanagement

IKNL / Centrum zelf

Funding

Pink Ribbon Amgen

Other

Publicatie resultaten interim analyse 2020; 5 jaar FUP analyse 2024

Objectives

Primary Objective(s): Phase II part: To determine the effect ofFMD on grade III/IV toxicity of patients with HER2 negative early breastcancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Phase III part: To determine the effect ofthe FMD on the pCR. Secondary Objectives: To determine the effect of FMD on clinical response measured with MRI halfwaythe neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To determine theeffect of FMD on grade I/II side effects of chemotherapy. To determine the effect of FMD on thebody’s metabolic and inflammatory response to chemotherapy. To determine the effect of FMD on DNAdamage, immunology, apoptosis and nutrient sensing pathways in the tumor. To determine the effect of FMD on thepatient’s quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23, VAS (Distress Thermometer) and patient’sperceptions (B-IPQ). To determine the effect of FMD ontreatment efficacy (DFS and OS). To study predictive biomarkers (hormonereceptor percentage, Ki67, immunologic tumor profile and tumor/stromaratio) in the tumor. To identify SNPs that can be used asbiomarkers to predict the effect of FMD on treatment outcome (efficacy andtoxicity) after chemotherapy. Optional Secondary Objectives: To identifyprotein profiles (proteomics) and cytokines that can be used as biomarkersto predict the effect of FMD on treatment outcome (efficacyand toxicity) after chemotherapy. To determine theeffect of FMD on chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in leukocytes. To determine theeffect of FMD on energy sensing pathways in leukocytes.

Endpoints

Primary study endpoint

  • PhaseII part: Grade III/IV toxicitywill be scored before each chemotherapeutic gift, after the last cycle and6 months after surgery using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 (see appendix A).
  • PhaseIII part: pCR at surgery will bemeasured using Miller and Payne (see appendix B). Study staff evaluatingpCR will be blind to the nature of the intervention.

Secondary study endpoints

  • Clinical response: measured by MRI after the last AC or FEC cycle of chemotherapy
  • Grade I and II side effects ofchemotherapy: scoredprior to every chemotherapeuticgift according NCI-CTC v 4.03 to quantify toxicity (see Appendix A) and alist of relevant side effects will be filled out (see Appendix C).
  • The body’s metabolic and inflammatory response to chemotherapy: every cycle just before start ofchemotherapy measure metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, insulin-likegrowth factor-1 (IGF-1)) and the inflammatory parameter C-reactive protein(CRP) will be measured. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3(IGF-BP3), free thyroxin (FT4), T3 and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) will be measured before the cycles 1, the last AC or FEC cycle and the last docetaxel cycle.
  • DNA damage, apoptosis, immunology, tumor/stroma ratio and nutrient sensing pathways in the tumor aftersurgery:

Chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in material of the tumor will be measured using the comet assay and the phosphorylation of H2AX, a protein involved in the DNA damage response.

Caspase-3 (as a measure of apoptosis) will be measured using immunohistochemistry and mTOR, AMPK, sirtuin and IGF-1 pathways will be characterized by Western blot, microarray and polymerase chain reaction. The results of the nutrient sensing pathways of the operation specimen will be compared with the biopsy.

Tumor biology is changing. Not only the tumor itself is important, its relation with the micro-environment determines the aggressive potential. The amount of stroma present in the primary tumor has shown to be an important prognostic parameter. Patients with a high amount of stroma have a worse prognosis whereas patients with no or little stroma show good survival. The Tumor/Stroma Ratio (TSR) can be determined on routine histological sections. Preliminary results also show that stroma has a protective role and that response to therapy differs for both stroma groups. We would like to validate the stroma parameter in this prospective trial. The two stroma groups will be evaluated for outcome and response to therapy. The TSR will be evaluated on HE slides.

  • Predictive biomarkers: after surgerymaterial of the tumor will be used to study: hormone receptor percentage,Ki67, immunologic tumor profile and TSR as defined above. The results of the operation specimen will be compared with the biopsy.
  • Patient’s quality of life and perceptions:patientswill be asked to fill out EORTC QLC-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 (except the questions about arm and breast symptoms47-53) questionnaire before start of chemotherapy (baseline), before the last AC or FEC cycle and before the last docetaxel cycle and 6 monthsafter surgery. Patients will be asked to fill out a distress thermometer (visualanalogue scale (VAS)) about experienced burden of therapy at baseline, before the last ACor FEC cycle and before the last docetaxel cycle and 6 months after therapy. At baseline and before the last docetaxel cycle patients will beasked to fill out the B-IPQ (two different forms) to measure illness perceptions (see appendix D).
  • DFS and OS: disease free survival and overall survival willbe determined after 5 and possibly 10 years according to the national guidelines.
  • SNPs: before start therapyan extra blood samples (5ml EDTA tube) will be taken to identify and prospectively validate unique genes that can be used as biomarkers to predict treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) after chemotherapy.

 

Optional secondary study endpoints

  • Proteomics andcytokines: before cycle 1 an extra blood sample (10ml gel tube) will be taken to identify protein profiles and cytokines that can be used as biomarkers topredict treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) after chemotherapy (see blood sampling 8.6).
  • Chemotherapy-induced DNA damage inleukocytes: at the first andthe last AC or FEC chemotherapy cycle, 2 extra blood samples (10 ml heparin tube each) will be taken before chemotherapy (baseline value) and3 hours after start of chemotherapy for quantification ofchemotherapy-induced DNA damage in leukocytes. Chemotherapy induced DNA damage will be measured using the comet assay and the phosphorylation of H2AX, a protein involved in the DNA damage response (see blood sampling8.6).
  • Nutrient sensing systems in leukocytes: at the first and the last AC or FEC cycle and before the last docetaxel cycle chemotherapy cycle, 2 extra blood samples (10 ml heparin tube each) will be taken for quantification of nutrient sensing systems in leukocytes before (baseline value) and 3 hours after start of chemotherapy. mTOR, AMPK, sirtuin and IGF-1 pathways will be characterized by Western blot, microarray and polymerase chain reaction (see blood sampling 8.6).

Eligibility Criteria

Female patients with stage II or III (cT1cN+ or ≥T2 any cN, cM0) breast cancer receiving neoadjuvantAC-T or FEC-T Measurable disease (breast and/or lymph nodes) HER2 negative core biopsy Age ≥18 years WHO performance status 0-2 Adequate bone marrow function: white blood cells (WBCs) ≥3.0 x 109/l, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/l, platelets ≥100 x 109/l Adequate liverfunction: bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL) range, ALAT and/or ASAT ≤2.5 x UNL, Alkaline Phosphatase ≤5 x UNL Adequate renal function: the calculated creatinine clearance should be ≥50 mL/min Patients must beaccessible for treatment and follow-up Written informed consent according to the local Ethics Committee requirements Willing to fill in quality of life questionnaires Able to read and writein Dutch

Regulatory Information

CCMO approval

Yes
Nr: NL44684.058.13

EC approval

Yes
Date: 12/09/2013
Nr:P13-135

EC

Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum
Amendments:
Yes
Date Last Amendment: 23/01/2015

EudraCT number

Not applicable

Downloads

Inloggen