BOOG Study Center
J.R. Kroep, H. Pijl, J.J.M van der Hoeven
R. Lugtenberg (studiecoördinator LUMC), A.E. van Leeuwen-Stok (BOOG SC)
Leiden University Medical Center Datacenter Surgery K6-R Phone +31 71 526 3500 Fax +31 71 526 6744 E-mail datacenter@lumc.nl
LUMC datacenter, Department of Surgery
IKNL / Centrum zelf
Pink Ribbon Amgen
Publicatie resultaten interim analyse 2020; 5 jaar FUP analyse 2024
Primary Objective(s): Phase II part: To determine the effect ofFMD on grade III/IV toxicity of patients with HER2 negative early breastcancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Phase III part: To determine the effect ofthe FMD on the pCR. Secondary Objectives: To determine the effect of FMD on clinical response measured with MRI halfwaythe neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To determine theeffect of FMD on grade I/II side effects of chemotherapy. To determine the effect of FMD on thebody’s metabolic and inflammatory response to chemotherapy. To determine the effect of FMD on DNAdamage, immunology, apoptosis and nutrient sensing pathways in the tumor. To determine the effect of FMD on thepatient’s quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23, VAS (Distress Thermometer) and patient’sperceptions (B-IPQ). To determine the effect of FMD ontreatment efficacy (DFS and OS). To study predictive biomarkers (hormonereceptor percentage, Ki67, immunologic tumor profile and tumor/stromaratio) in the tumor. To identify SNPs that can be used asbiomarkers to predict the effect of FMD on treatment outcome (efficacy andtoxicity) after chemotherapy. Optional Secondary Objectives: To identifyprotein profiles (proteomics) and cytokines that can be used as biomarkersto predict the effect of FMD on treatment outcome (efficacyand toxicity) after chemotherapy. To determine theeffect of FMD on chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in leukocytes. To determine theeffect of FMD on energy sensing pathways in leukocytes.
Primary study endpoint
Secondary study endpoints
Chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in material of the tumor will be measured using the comet assay and the phosphorylation of H2AX, a protein involved in the DNA damage response.
Caspase-3 (as a measure of apoptosis) will be measured using immunohistochemistry and mTOR, AMPK, sirtuin and IGF-1 pathways will be characterized by Western blot, microarray and polymerase chain reaction. The results of the nutrient sensing pathways of the operation specimen will be compared with the biopsy.
Tumor biology is changing. Not only the tumor itself is important, its relation with the micro-environment determines the aggressive potential. The amount of stroma present in the primary tumor has shown to be an important prognostic parameter. Patients with a high amount of stroma have a worse prognosis whereas patients with no or little stroma show good survival. The Tumor/Stroma Ratio (TSR) can be determined on routine histological sections. Preliminary results also show that stroma has a protective role and that response to therapy differs for both stroma groups. We would like to validate the stroma parameter in this prospective trial. The two stroma groups will be evaluated for outcome and response to therapy. The TSR will be evaluated on HE slides.
Optional secondary study endpoints
Female patients with stage II or III (cT1cN+ or ≥T2 any cN, cM0) breast cancer receiving neoadjuvantAC-T or FEC-T Measurable disease (breast and/or lymph nodes) HER2 negative core biopsy Age ≥18 years WHO performance status 0-2 Adequate bone marrow function: white blood cells (WBCs) ≥3.0 x 109/l, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/l, platelets ≥100 x 109/l Adequate liverfunction: bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL) range, ALAT and/or ASAT ≤2.5 x UNL, Alkaline Phosphatase ≤5 x UNL Adequate renal function: the calculated creatinine clearance should be ≥50 mL/min Patients must beaccessible for treatment and follow-up Written informed consent according to the local Ethics Committee requirements Willing to fill in quality of life questionnaires Able to read and writein Dutch